I know nobody gafs, but it is nice to see some focus on the way "tradition" is constructed:
The reputations of other early blues artists have ballooned, in some cases to the verge of overinflation. Children of the rock era have worked hard to validate the music of their own time by historicizing it, adopting blues history as rock’s prehistory, and canonizing a select group of blues founders who best fit the image rockers like to project. This narcissistic boomer retroactivism has codified a conception of blues-making as it was practiced by the great rural innovators — Robert Johnson, Charley Patton, Blind Lemon Jefferson and others who worked in and around the Mississippi Delta during the first years of the last century. From this point of view, a legitimate historic blues artist must have been poor, unschooled, inadequately recognized in his time and perhaps beset by tragedy, as well as African-American and male (despite the prevalence of women among the most prominent singers and composers in early blues).
From: "WC Handy Review" in the NY Times
if you know no one gafs....
ReplyDelete